2013 Mazda3

best car 2013 Mazda3

The 2013 Mazda3 ranks 4 out of 43 Affordable Small Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 58 published reviews and test drives of the Mazda3, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

While the 2013 Mazda3 ranks highly for its strong engines and sharp handling, reviewers think it isn’t as practical as its classmates.

One thing that separates the Mazda3 from its classmates is its nimble, accurate handling, which makes it one of the most fun-to-drive models in the class. All models have a four-cylinder engine. The base model has 148 horsepower and the most powerful model, the Mazdaspeed3, has 263 horsepower. Regardless of which engine you choose, reviewers say that most shoppers will be very pleased with the Mazda3’s performance. The only downside to the Mazda3, auto writers say, is that fuel economy from all but one engine isn’t very good. The 155-horsepower Skyactiv engine, which was new for the 2012 model year, achieves an EPA-estimated 28/40 mpg city/highway, which is great for a small car. Plus, it doesn’t sacrifice performance for efficiency. All models except the Mazdaspeed3, which only comes with a six-speed manual transmission, offer a manual and automatic transmission. Depending on the trim, these transmissions have five or six gears. Test drivers think both the manual and automatic transmissions are responsive, but some find that the manuals make the Mazda3 feel faster.

While the 2013 Mazda3’s performance receives a glowing review from the automotive press, overall evaluations of its interior aren’t as positive. Many auto writers say that the Mazda3’s second-row seats feel tight for the class. Some test drivers even say the front seats won’t offer enough room for tall adults. The Mazda3 is available in sedan and hatchback body styles, and several auto writers complain that the sedan doesn’t have much cargo space, though hatchback models have a lot. While no test driver says that the Mazda3’s interior is cheap, reviewers think the quality of its plastics are below its main rivals like the Volkswagen Golf. Reviewers think most of the Mazda3’s interior controls are straightforward, but some take issue with the Mazda3’s optional navigation system. They say its small screen, awkward placement in the dashboard and complicated, steering-wheel mounted controls make it a pain to use.

2013 Mazda CX-5

best car 2013 Mazda CX-5

The 2013 Mazda CX-5 ranks 2 out of 21 Affordable Compact SUVs. This ranking is based on our analysis of 17 published reviews and test drives of the Mazda CX-5, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Car reviewers give the 2013 Mazda CX-5 a glowing letter of recommendation for its phenomenal handling, near-perfect manual transmission and outstanding fuel economy figures.

Performance is the main reason to choose the 2013 Mazda CX-5. The CX-5’s handling, which reviewers say runs a close second to the small and sporty Mazda MX-5 Miata, is as good as it gets in this class. The CX-5 earns praise for its neutral handling and great corner-hugging ability. Test drivers like the CX-5’s six-speed manual transmission just as much, saying it shifts smoothly and makes the CX-5 really engaging to drive. One thing reviewers crave is more power from the Mazda CX-5’s 155-horsepower four-cylinder engine because a boost would come in handy when traveling uphill.

Shoppers who prioritize comfort or high-tech features over agile handling should take a close look at the Mazda CX-5’s interior before purchasing. The front and rear seats are comfortable, but like many small SUVs, the rear seats may be tight for three adults, especially on long trips. With a standard USB port and optional Bluetooth and navigation, reviewers consider the 2013 Mazda CX-5’s list of tech features dull compared with models that have standard Bluetooth and optional rearview cameras and infotainment systems, like the 2013 Ford Escape’s MyFord Touch.

As a complete package, reviewers like the 2013 Mazda CX-5 a lot. Good cargo space, excellent fuel economy, strong safety ratings and a quality interior are wrapped in a sporty, attractive exterior. Best of all, they say the Mazda CX-5 is just as fun to drive as it looks.

2012 Mercedes Benz G-Class

best car 2012 Mercedes Benz G-Class

Nearly every reviewer says that the 2012 Mercedes-Benz G-Class’ strange combination of unbeatable off-road performance, top-notch build quality and unique looks gives it a spot in their dream garage.

If you’re looking for a sensible luxury large SUV that will get your family through a few winter snow storms and putter around town the rest of the year, the G-Class is not the SUV for you. The auto press agrees that the Mercedes-Benz G-Class is one of the least practical vehicles on the market. But if you’re able to spend some serious cash on a true automotive icon with legendary off-road capabilities, it doesn’t get much better than the military-inspired G550.

Test drivers say the G-Class’ on-road handling is terrible, it has some of the worst ergonomics in the class, its electronics are unintuitive and its interior is fairly cramped for such a large SUV. So what’s its attraction?

Its V8 engine is ridiculously powerful, giving it acceleration that’s unreal to experience in a shoebox of an SUV. Reviewers say that it feels as well-built as a bank vault, and its interior materials and fit and finish can’t get much better. Automotive journalists report that it’s one of the most capable off-road vehicles on the market. And the exclusivity that comes with a price tag of more than $100,000 doesn’t hurt either.

Nearly every critic agrees there’s no way to justify the Mercedes-Benz G-Class as a rational purchase. However, if you’ve got the budget for an illogical but supremely capable toy, you won’t have much more fun in an SUV than you will in a Mercedes G550.

2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

best car 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class ranks 3 out of 20 Upscale Midsize Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 51 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz C-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Reviewers say that the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class offers a stylish exterior, composed handling and a high-quality interior.

From the base C250 to the high-performance C63 AMG, the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class covers a broad spectrum in terms of performance. Some reviewers say that the base C250’s turbocharged four-cylinder engine provides adequate power, though a few critics don’t think that it’s competitive within the class. C300 and C350 models, however, offer ample power from their V6 engines. A seven-speed automatic transmission comes standard, and most reviewers agree that it’s smooth and refined. With 22/31 mpg city/highway, the C250 earns good fuel economy within the class, though rivals like the Audi A4, BMW 328i and Buick Regal eAssist all earn slightly better estimates. Test drivers say that while some rivals have better handling than the C-Class, it’s still nimble and fun to drive. Additionally, most critics are pleased with the C-Class' comfortable, yet composed ride.

Inside, the 2013 C-Class offers a straightforward, yet elegant design that auto writers like. Many test drivers agree that the back seat isn’t the most spacious in the class, but passenger space up front is good and the C-Class earns positive comments for its high-quality materials and solid construction. One test driver even compares the C-Class to its significantly more expensive sibling, the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. Some reviewers think that the C-Class’ electronic features could be easier to use, while others say that its controls are intuitive. The C-Class comes with a nice list of standard features, though some of its options, such as leather upholstery and heated seats, can be found standard on competing cars.

2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class

best car 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class ranks 11 out of 12 Super Luxury Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 10 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS sports a freshly redesigned interior and exterior, as well as a more powerful engine. Most reviewers love the changes, but say that it’s no small task to reinvent the original CLS’ four-door coupe design.

The Mercedes-Benz CLS has been completely redesigned for 2012, and Mercedes says that the new CLS is more fuel-efficient, thanks to a new 4.6-liter twin-turbo V8 and seven-speed transmission.

So far, test drivers report that there’s no turbo lag, and that the engine is powerful and quiet. “The V8 has a nice little growl when pushed hard but quiets down at cruising speed,” writes AutoWeek. “A stop-start feature to save fuel and reduce emissions is standard, and it worked seamlessly on our test drive in Tuscany." The new engine is smaller than the previous model’s 5.5-liter V8, but it’s also more powerful thanks to twin turbochargers, and the automotive press generally likes the performance.

Although Mercedes boasts that the redesigned 2012 CLS is bolder, sportier and sleeker than its predecessor, many reviewers think that the outgoing model’s groundbreaking design is a tough act to follow. However, one aspect of the redesigned exterior that reviewers love is the optional LED headlights with adaptive high beams and Active Curve Illumination. “These are the slickest all-singing, all-dancing lamps you've ever seen, with every adaptive lighting function you can imagine being provided by LEDs: they bend in turns, swivel to look ahead when you turn onto side roads, automatically dip the high beams for oncoming traffic-but only on the left side so you can still see to your right,” says Automobile Magazine.

Most test drivers are pleased with the 2012 CLS’ interior, but some think the back seat can be cramped for taller passengers. The interior of the 2012 CLS features a chunky, leather-wrapped steering wheel, leather seats and either burl walnut or optional black ash wood trim. Reviewers generally like the look, and say the standard navigation and COMAND system are relatively easy to use. That’s a big deal for Mercedes, since the first few generations of its COMAND infotainment and navigation system were blasted for being confusing and counterintuitive.

2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

best car 2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class ranks 1 out of 13 Luxury Large Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 26 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz E-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

A luxurious interior and an improved powertrain make the 2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class a top choice among luxury sedans.

There’s a reason why the 2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class is at the top of the luxury large car heap. Although Mercedes redesigned the E-Class in 2010, the automaker continues to tweak and improve the E-Class sedan. Autoblog writes, “If we didn't know any better, we'd swear the E-Class is trying to be a better S-Class."

Inside, the E-Class is basically unchanged for 2012. Reviewers find the same comfortable, opulent interior seen on the 2011 model, and although critics love the high-quality materials and excellent build quality, they do have a few concerns. They note that the E-Class’ price can inflate quickly with options, and while the E-Class comes standard with Mercedes’ COMAND system, a handful of reviewers say that it complicates audio, climate and navigation functions.

However, the E-Class still has a spacious back seat, a large trunk and some significant updates under the hood. Both the E350 and E550 have increased power and fuel efficiency for 2012, and the E550 now comes standard with Mercedes’ 4Matic all-wheel drive. Shoppers looking for great fuel economy may also want to consider the diesel-powered E350 Bluetec.

With so many available options, there’s an E-Class that will suit every shopper’s needs, provided you’ve got the cash to buy one.

2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class

best car 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class ranks 4 out of 10 Luxury Large SUVs. This ranking is based on our analysis of 7 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz GL-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

The redesigned 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class has a high price for a three-row luxury crossover, but reviewers say that if you can pay for it, you’ll love the GL’s performance and high-tech features.

Test drivers love the way the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL drives, and appreciate the great fuel economy from its standard diesel engine. Though they write that the base engine is powerful enough for around-town driving, reviewers love the more-powerful V8 engines available in higher trims. They also write that the GL’s handling is smooth and flat in the corners, and that it feels more nimble than most other large SUVs in its price range. Unlike most other luxury large SUVs, the GL isn’t meant for off-roading, but most auto writers say that its standard all-wheel drive should be plenty capable for most muddy roads or snowy driveways that buyers will encounter.

On the inside, reviewers say the GL is roomy, luxurious and available with lots of interior tech. They write that the GL’s cabin is nicer than most of its competition, and they appreciate the power-folding second-row seats that make the third row easy to access. In past generations, reviewers complained about Mercedes’ confusing COMAND infotainment system and that criticism persists, along with charges that the system feels dated as well. Plus, many note that in order to get the cool tech features like night vision assist or active lane keeping assist, shoppers are forced to upgrade to higher trims or add expensive options packages.

2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

best car 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class ranks 9 out of 10 Luxury Compact SUVs. This ranking is based on our analysis of 12 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Though reviewers agree that the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK is powerful, they say its lack of passenger and cargo space make it impractical compared with other compact SUVs.

The base 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK has a standard 302-horsepower, V6 engine, a seven-speed automatic transmission and stop/start technology, which idles the engine when the GLK stops to conserve fuel. Overall, reviewers like the V6 engine’s power and say it’s evident as soon as they press the accelerator. Some test drivers think the start/stop system is unrefined and others say the transmission is slow to downshift. A 190-horsepower, four-cylinder diesel engine will be available in early 2013, but no reviewer has tested it yet and fuel economy ratings aren’t available yet. All-wheel drive is optional with either engine. According to the EPA, the GLK averages 19/25 mpg city/highway without all-wheel drive and 19/24 mpg with all-wheel drive. Though several car writers say the GLK’s rivals are sportier, they also say that the GLK has a car-like ride.

The 2013 GLK meets reviewer expectations with a cabin that’s both well-made and stylish. The base model lacks standard features, such as an iPod interface and leather seats, that are standard on many competitors. Still, some reviewers think the faux leather seats are nice, and say it’s hard to tell that the seats aren’t covered in real leather. One thing many auto writers complain about is the GLK’s lack of interior space. They find that the front-row seats are spacious, comfortable and offer outstanding visibility, but think the second-row seats are tight for a compact SUV. Reviewers are also disappointed that the GLK has less cargo space than many of its rivals.

2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class

best car 2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ranks 11 out of 19 Luxury Midsize SUVs. This ranking is based on our analysis of 12 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz M-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Reviewers love the 2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class' well-made interior and great performance, but it may not be a good value when compared with rivals.

One of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class' high points is its performance. Offering a variety of powertrains, including a V6 engine, a diesel option, a V8and a high-performance 518-horsepower AMG model, shoppers will have an easy time finding an M-Class model that matches their needs. The diesel-powered ML 350 Bluetec gets an EPA rating of 20/28 mpg city/highway, which is great, even when compared with other diesel SUVs. Additionally, the base ML350 is now available with rear-wheel drive rather than only with all-wheel drive, which allows buyers to trade a bit of all-weather capability for improved gas mileage. Though the ML63 AMG gets horrendous fuel economy, test drivers love its powerful acceleration and sporty handling.

Most reviewers agree that the 2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class's five-seat cabin is well-built, attractively designed and comfortable, but its list of standard features is shorter than many rivals. Reviewers write that the M-Class is plenty comfortable in both the front and back seats, and that most of its switchgear is easy to use, though its COMAND infotainment controls still have a fairly steep learning curve. Though reviewers like the M-Class' interior, it's important to note that despite its high price tag, it doesn't come standard with many features that competitors offer. For instance, you'll have to pay extra for features like leather upholstery, push-button start and a rearview camera, which many competitors offer at no extra cost. Still, if you can afford it, reviewers say you’ll be very happy with the Mercedes-Benz M-Class.

2012 Mercedes-Benz S-Class

best car 2012 Mercedes-Benz S-Class

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz S-Class ranks 1 out of 12 Super Luxury Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 101 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz S-Class offers a posh interior and capable performance, but a high price may limit its appeal.

At first glance, the 2012 Mercedes-Benz S-Class may not quicken the pulse like the Porsche Panamera, Audi A8 or BMW 7-Series. All of these rivals are either new or recently redesigned in the last few years, and while the S-Class has a stately, elegant look, it’s also had the same bodywork since 2007.

However, despite newer entries into the segment, the 2012 S-Class remains a fully-competitive luxury sedan. The returning S550 boasts a new engine that’s more fuel-efficient and more powerful, and reviewers love the S-Class’ spacious, opulent interior.

Shoppers looking for a bit of practicality may also like the new S350 Bluetec diesel, which takes the S-Class’ winning attributes and adds exceptional fuel economy and standard all-wheel drive. “Like all S-classes, the S350 exudes all the best Mercedes qualities,” writes Automobile Magazine. “It's spacious and luxurious, and its precision German engineering is evident in almost every detail.”

With so much comfort, luxury and well-rounded performance, the S-Class seems a shoo-in among luxury car shoppers. However, there is one major hurdle to overcome: price. With a base MSRP that’s several thousand dollars more than many rival sedans, the S-Class doesn’t come cheap.

2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class

best car 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class

The 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class ranks 4 out of 6 Luxury Sports Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 8 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

The newly-redesigned Mercedes-Benz SLK isn’t the best performer in the class, but reviewers say it’s still an extremely satisfying sports car with just the right mix of luxury and driving fun.

Previous generations of the Mercedes-Benz SLK have been seen as a sports car that’s more about looks than performance. The 2012 SLK fights that perception, reviewers say. Though most reviewers agree that the SLK still isn’t an exceptional performer, they do say it skillfully mixes luxury with a sporty drive, resulting in a car that’s equally at home on Sunday drives and Monday commutes.

The 2012 SLK is a two-seat hard-top convertible. The redesign added some impressive features, including a glass roof panel that can darken to keep the cabin cool, a revamped and easy-to-use infotainment system, and premium cabin materials that reviewers love. They’re also extremely positive about the SLK’s revamped styling, saying the SLK looks expensive and exotic. What reviewers don’t love is the SLK’s sometimes-touchy throttle response and price, which starts high and rises quickly when buyers start adding optional features.

Overall, reviewers agree that the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK is a very good car. Its performance is muted compared to other luxury sports cars, which irks some reviewers. Other reviewers, however, recognize that not all buyers are looking to test their driving skills every time they get behind the wheel. For drivers who want a comfortable cruiser that can be reasonably sporty when asked, reviewers recommend the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

2013 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class

best car 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class

The 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class ranks 4 out of 5 Super Luxury Sports Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 6 published reviews and test drives of the Mercedes-Benz SL-Class, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Reviewers say that the redesigned 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL offers a healthy dose of luxury, as well as a balance of performance and comfort that’s difficult to match.

Few cars are capable of offering lightning-quick performance, a comfortable ride and an interior that surrounds you in opulent luxury. However, auto writers agree that the redesigned 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL550 does exactly that. In general, test drivers say that Mercedes has built a better SL than ever. Its interior draws some influence from the more-powerful SLS AMG, and some journalists note that Mercedes’ COMAND infotainment system has become easier to use.

That interior, combined with the SL550’s great performance, should be enough to win the hearts of shoppers who are looking for a refined sports car. However, some test drivers say that despite these attributes, the new Mercedes SL has a face for radio. “The new SL is a wonderful car,” writes Automobile Magazine. “It behaves beautifully, sounds magnificent under full acceleration, and is luxuriously comfortable. Too bad it's so clumsily styled.”

However, if you don’t mind the way the 2013 SL550 looks, reviewers agree that you’ll find that it’s a great car. They say the SL550 rides just as comfortably as most luxury sedans, yet it’s also nimble and powerful enough to have some fun on twisty back roads. And thanks to its retractable hardtop, the 2013 SL550 has a quiet highway ride. You’ll also get a larger trunk than you’d find in the Porsche 911 Carrera or Nissan GT-R. So if you’re looking for a sports car that combines opulent interior style with great performance and comfort, the 2013 Mercedes SL550 is a better choice than ever.

2013 Mini Cooper Clubman

best car 2013 Mini Cooper Clubman

The 2013 Mini Cooper Clubman ranks 26 out of 43 Affordable Small Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 34 published reviews and test drives of the Mini Cooper Clubman, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.

Auto writers think the 2013 Mini Cooper Clubman is a top performer thanks to its agile handling and powerful engine options, but they say competing cars have more practical passenger and cargo accommodations.

The 2013 Mini Cooper Clubman can come with one of three four-cylinder engines. The base engine makes 121 horsepower. The Cooper S and John Cooper Works models have turbocharged engines making 181 and 208 horsepower, respectively. Most test drivers are pleased with each of these engines. Some even say the base model’s engine power is just fine for everyday driving. All models have a standard six-speed manual transmission, which some test drivers prefer over the optional six-speed automatic. They like the manual because they say it seems to improve acceleration. The Cooper Clubman’s fuel economy is good for the class, reaching an EPA-estimated 27/35 mpg city/highway with the base engine and either transmission. According to the automotive press, the Mini Cooper Clubman is one of the most engaging cars in the class to drive, thanks to its agile handling, which makes it fun to whip around corners and easy to maneuver in tight areas. Some reviewers say the Cooper Clubman’s sporty driving dynamics come at the cost of ride quality, which they say is bumpy. Though it has good overall performance, the Cooper Clubman has a below-average reliability score, which may make competitors, like the Mazda3 that have good performance and reliability ratings, appealing alternatives.

Test drivers like the Cooper Clubman’s well-made, retro-inspired cabin, but they say its interior tech features are confusing. The Cooper Clubman’s standard features include Bluetooth, a USB port and HD Radio, which is good for the class, but reviewers find the climate, stereo and optional infotainment system frustrating to use. The Mini Cooper Clubman seats four, and test drivers say its cabin is small. Reviewers do appreciate that it offers more cargo space than the Mini Cooper Hardtop, but say that the room available with the rear seats up pales in comparison with the rest of the class. They add that the rear seats are cramped for adults. The second row is also hard to enter and exit, but critics like that the passenger-side access door makes it easier to get in and out of the cabin.